“They Would Never Approach an Assembly of Wise Men”: Sophists, Anti-Sophists, and Early Christianity
Table of contents
Share
Metrics
“They Would Never Approach an Assembly of Wise Men”: Sophists, Anti-Sophists, and Early Christianity
Annotation
PII
S207987840010542-5-1
DOI
10.18254/S207987840010542-5
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Aleksey Panteleev 
Affiliation: Saint Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg
Abstract

The use of the term “sophist” in the works of pagan authors who wrote about early Christianity does not necessarily have an exclusively negative meaning, dating back to the opponents of Socrates and Plato. In the 2nd and 3rd centuries this word was used in relation to an outstanding speaker and sometimes as a self-designation. Individual Christian intellectuals who had received a rhetorical education could claim the title of sophists by borrowing the forms of sophists’ works and some of their ideas, and pagans noticed this similarity. They considered these claims ridiculous and noting some typological similarity portrayed Christian teachers as “anti-sophists” who violated accepted norms. Nevertheless the very fact that this similarity was recognized meant that pagans were ready to consider Christianity a part of the cultural and religious life of antiquity. Also this proved that the believers themselves did not evade ancient models and they strove to speak a language understandable to contemporaries and use images known to them.

Keywords
Early Christianity, Roman Empire, Second Sophistic, Apologists, Lucian, Celsus
Received
19.05.2020
Publication date
30.07.2020
Number of characters
40190
Number of purchasers
4
Views
108
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue
1000 RUB / 10.0 SU
All issues for 2020
1200 RUB / 20.0 SU

References

1. Margules B. B. Lukian i rannee khristianstvo // Voprosy nauchnogo ateizma. Vyp. 13. M., 1972. S. 321—350.

2. Rannie muchenichestva. Perevody, kommentarii, issledovaniya / pod red. A. D. Panteleeva. SPb., 2017.

3. Panteleev A. D. «Muchenichestvo Polikarpa» i «O smerti Peregrina» Lukiana: esche raz o starom spore // Indoevropejskoe yazykoznanie i klassicheskaya filologiya. 2017. Vyp. 21. S. 642—652.

4. Flavij Filostrat. Zhizni sofistov / per. E. G. Rabinovicha. M., 2017.

5. Andrade N. J. Assyrians, Syrians and the Greek Language in the Late Hellenistic and Roman Imperial Periods // Journal of Near Eastern Studies. 2014. Vol. 73. P. 299—317.

6. Bagnani G. Peregrinus Proteus and the Christians // Historia. 1955. Bd. 4. 1955. S. 107—112.

7. Barnes T. D. Tertullian. A Historical and Literary Study. Oxford, 1971.

8. Becker M. Origen the Sophist: Anti-Sophistic Polemic in Porphyry’s Contra Christianos // Vigiliae Christianae. 2019. Vol. 73. P. 159—173.

9. Benko S. Pagan Criticism of Christianity During the First Two Centuries // Aufstieg und Niedergang der romischen Welt. Bd. 2.23.2. Berlin, 1980. P. 1055—1118.

10. Betz H. D. Lukian von Samosata und das Neue Testament. Berlin, 1961.

11. Bloomer W. M. Latinitas // The Oxford Handbook of the Second Sophistic / ed. by D. S. Richter, W. A. Johnson. Oxford, 2017. P. 67—80.

12. Bowersock G. W. Greek Sophists in the Roman Empire. Oxford, 1969.

13. Bowersock G. W. Martyrdom and Rome. Cambridge, 1995.

14. Bowie E. L. Greeks and Their Past in the Second Sophistic // Past and Present. 1970. Vol. 46. P. 3—41.

15. Brent A. Ignatius’ Pagan Background in Second Century Asia Minor // Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum. 2007. Vol. 10. P. 207—232.

16. Carhart R. The Second Sophistic and the Cultural Idealization of Paul in Acts // Engaging Early Christian History: Reading Acts in the Second Century / ed. by R. Dupertuis, T. Penner. Cambridge, 2013. P. 187—208.

17. Caster M. Lucien et la pensée religieuse ile son temps. P., 1937.

18. Den Dulk M., Langford A. Polycarp and Polemo: Christianity at the Center of the Second Sophistic // The History of Religions School Today: Essays on the New Testament and Related Ancient Mediterranean Texts / ed. by T. R. Blanton, R. M. Calhoun, C. K. Rothschild. Tübingen, 2014. P. 211—240.

19. Eshleman K. Defining the Circle of Sophists: Philostratus and the Construction of the Second Sophistic // Classical Philology. 2008. Vol. 103. P. 395—413.

20. Eshleman K. The Social World of Intellectuals in the Roman Empire. Sophists, Philosophers, and Christians. Cambridge, 2012.

21. Fojtik J. E. Tatian the Barbarian: Language, Education, and Identity in the Oratio Ad Graecos // Continuity and Discontinuity in Early Christian Apologetics / ed. by A.-Chr. Jacobsen, M. Kahlos, J. Ulrich. Frankfurt a. M., 2009. P. 23—34.

22. Guast W. Greek declamation beyond Philostratus’ Second Sophistic // Journal of Hellenic Studies. 2019. Vol. 139. P. 1—15.

23. Harrison S. J. Apuleius. A Latin Sophist. Oxford, 2000.

24. Hartog P. Greco-Roman Understanding of Christianity // The Routledge Companion to Early Christian Thought / ed. by D. J. Bingham. Abingdon, 2009. P. 51—67.

25. Johnson A. P. Early Christianity and the Classical Tradition // The Oxford Handbook of the Second Sophistic / ed. by D. S. Richter, W. A. Johnson. Oxford, 2017. P. 625—638.

26. Karavas O. Luciano, los christianos y Jesucristo // Lucian of Samosata, Greek Writer and Roman Citizen / ed. by F. Mestre, P. Gómez. Barcelona, 2010. P. 115—120.

27. Lampe P. From Paul to Valentinus. Christians at Rome in the First Two Centuries. Minneapolis, 2003.

28. Lechner T. Süße Lust des Logos. Die Vorrede zum Protreptikos des Clemens von Alexandrien und die prolaliai der Zweiten Sophistik // Logos der Vernunft — Logos des Glaubens. Edgar Früchtel zum 80. Geburtstag / hrsg. von F. R. Prostmeier, H. E. Lona. Berlin, 2010. S. 149—205.

29. Lucien de Samosate. Philopseudès et De Morte Peregrini / ed. par J. Schwartz. P., 1951.

30. Nasrallah L. S. Christian Responses to Roman Art and Architecture: The Second-Century Church amid the Spaces of Empire. Cambridge, 2010.

31. Osborn E. Irenaeus of Lyons. Cambridge, 2001.

32. Pernot L. Christianisme et sophistique // Papers on Rhetoric IV / ed. par L.C. Montefusco. Rome, 2002. P. 245—262.

33. Pernot L. Saint Pionios, martyr et orateur // Du héros païen au saint chrétien / ed. par G. Freyburger, L. Pernot. P., 1997. P. 111—123.

34. Puech B. Orateurs et sophistes grecs dans les inscriptions d’époque impériale. P., 2002.

35. Schmitz Th. Bildung und Macht. Zur sozialen und politischen Funktion der zweiten Sophistik in der griechischen Welt der Kaiserzeit. München, 1997.

36. Secord J. The Cultural Geography of a Greek Christian: Irenaeus from Smyrna to Lyons // Irenaeus: life, scripture, legacy / ed. by S. Parvis, P. Foster. Minneapolis, 2012. P. 25—33.

37. Swain S. Hellenism and Empire: language, classicism, and power in the Greek world, AD 50—250. Oxford, 1996.

38. Tatian. Oratio ad Graecos and Fragments / ed. by M. Whittaker. Oxford, 1982.

39. Thomson S. R. The Barbarian Sophist: Clement of Alexandria’s Stromateis and the Second Sophistic (PhD thesis). Oxford, 2014.

40. Vos J. S. Paul and sophistic rhetoric: a perspective on his argumentation in the letter to the Galatians // Acta Theologica. 2008. Vol. 28. Suppl. 9. P. 29—52.

41. Die “Wahre Lehre” des Kelsos / hrsg. von H. E. Lona. Freiburg; Basel; Vienna, 2005.

42. Walzer R. Galen on Jews and Christians. Oxford, 1949.

43. Wilken R. L. The Christians as the Romans saw them. New Heaven; L., 1984.

44. Winter B. W. Philo and Paul among the Sophists. Cambridge, 1997.

45. Wyss B. Der gekreuzigte Sophist // Early Christianity. 2014. Vol. 5. P. 503—527.