Military Aspect of Evolution of the Euro-Atlantic Relationships during the Second Presidential Term of Barack Obama (2013—2017): the Factor of Russia
Table of contents
Share
Metrics
Military Aspect of Evolution of the Euro-Atlantic Relationships during the Second Presidential Term of Barack Obama (2013—2017): the Factor of Russia
Annotation
PII
S207987840010256-0-1
DOI
10.18254/S207987840010256-0
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Zakhar Pokudov 
Affiliation: Kazan Federal University
Address: Russian Federation, Kazan
Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the Russian factor for the changes within the Euro-Atlantic military relationships during Barack Obama’s second presidential term. That was highlighted by the strengthening of the cooperation within NATO as a responsive reaction of the USA and EU to the Russian-Ukrainian events in 2014. It is noted that in a post-bipolar world NATO was lacking raison d'être due to the dissolution of the USSR. Consequently, the tendency to the political-military regionalization had significantly increased within the transatlantic alliance. These tendencies had been reflected in different approaches of the leading NATO countries towards Russia in the early 2000s. It is also highlighted that since early 2010s the prerequisites for the future deterioration of the relationships between the USA and Russia and the EU and Russia were formed. Thus, the foundation for the future improvement of the transatlantic military relations was formed, for which the Ukrainian crisis is appeared to be a turning point because it caused the changes in a post-Cold War European security system. In order to identify the consistent patterns in this process the historical-genetic method was applied. The content analysis method has been used to demonstrate changes in the conceptual design of military-political relations based on official documents and statements. The scientific novelty of this study lies in the fact that the previous works on this issue mainly analyzed changes in bilateral relations within the US — Russia and the EU — Russia frames. However, due attention was not paid to the influence of the Russian factor on the changes for the bilateral US — EU relations. Changing the perspective of analysis allowed us to get a new look, as well as attract new foreign sources and literature. The author concludes that during the second presidential term of B. Obama, NATO de facto had a raison d'être for presence in Europe, which contributed to a significant strengthening of the military-political cooperation of Euro-Atlantic relations.

Keywords
International relations, Barack Obama, the USA, the EU, NATO, Russia, regionalization of military-political interests, transatlantic relations
Received
24.06.2020
Publication date
31.01.2021
Number of characters
29972
Number of purchasers
1
Views
51
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue
1000 RUB / 10.0 SU
All issues for 2021
5000 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. Vojtolovskij F. G. Ideologiya i praktika atlantizma vo vneshnej politike SShA; dis. … dok. polit. nauk. M., 2013.

2. Izotov A. V. Faktory formirovaniya i razvitiya otnoshenij mezhdu Evropejskim soyuzom i Rossiej // Azimut nauchnykh issledovanij: ehkonomika i upravlenie. 2015. № 4. S. 83—86.

3. Kontseptsiya vneshnej politiki Rossijskoj Federatsii. 30 noyabrya, 2016 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.mid.ru/foreign_policy/official_documents/-/asset_publisher/CptICkB6BZ29/content/id/2542248 (data obrascheniya: 13.06.2020).

4. Proekt Dogovora o evropejskoj bezopasnosti / Prezident Rossii. 29 noyabrya 2009 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/6152 (data obrascheniya: 24.02.2020).

5. Pushkov A. K. Vneshnyaya politika Rossii i ee natsional'nye interesy v XXI v. M.: MGIMO-Universitet, 2011.

6. Smaglo P. N., Shasheva S. N. Evropejskaya bezopasnost' v kontekste otnoshenij Rossii i NATO v Chernomorskom regione v postbipolyarnyj period // Manuskript. 2020. T. 13. № 2. S. 55—59.

7. Solovej F. D. Politika administratsii Dzh. Busha-ml. i pervoj administratsii B. Obamy v otnoshenii Rossijskoj Federatsii i stran SNG (2001—2012 gg.): sravnitel'nyj analiz // Sravnitel'naya politika. 2017. T. 8. № 3. S. 72—95.

8. Shablovskij V. S. Otnosheniya Rossii i NATO v kontekste krizisa na Ukraine // Postsovetskie issledovaniya. 2019. T. 2. № 2. S. 1032—1041.

9. Shakleina T. A. Rossiya i SShA v mirovoj politike: Ucheb. posobie dlya studentov vuzov. M.: Aspekt Press, 2012.

10. Anastasov P. The Black Sea region: a critical intersection // NATO Review. 25 May 2018 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2018/05/25/the-black-sea-region-a-critical-intersection/index.html (data obrascheniya: 06.04.2020).

11. Blackwill R. Trump’s Foreign Policies Are Better Than They Seem. Council on Foreign Relations. 2019.

12. Boettger K. Die EU-Russland-Beziehungen: Ruecklblick und Ausblick im Zeichen der Ukraine-Krise // Integration. 2015. № 3. S. 204—213.

13. Charter of Paris for a New Europe // OSCE. 21 November 1990 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.osce.org/mc/39516 (data obrascheniya: 10.06.2020).

14. Defence Expenditure of NATO Countries (2011—2018). 10 July 2018 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2018_07/20180709_180710-pr2018-91-en.pdf (data obrascheniya: 11.06.2020).

15. Dunay P. Die Auswirkungen der Ukraine-Krise auf die europäische und die euroatlantische Sicherheit — und was wir daraus lernen können // OSZE-Jahrbuch. 2014. S. 269—296.

16. Erlanger S., Hirschfeld J. D and Castle S. NATO Plans a Special Force to Reassure Eastern Europe and Deter Russia // The New York Times. 05.09.2014 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/06/world/europe/nato-summit.html (data obrascheniya: 10.06.2020).

17. European Foreign Policy Scorecard 2015. European Council on Foreign Relations, 2015.

18. Foreign Affairs Council. 19 January 2015 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/fac/2015/01/19/ (data obrascheniya: 10.06.2020).

19. New York Times. Highlights: In Brussels, Trump Scolds Allies on Cost-Sharing, and Stays Vague on Article 5 // New York Times. 25 May 2017 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/25/world/europe/trump-brussels-nato.html (data obrascheniya: 14.06.2020).

20. Noetzel T., Schreer B. Does a Multi-Tier NATO Matter? The Atlantic Alliance and the Process of Strategic Change // International Affairs. 2009. № 2. P. 211—226.

21. Readiness Action Plan. 23 March 2020 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_119353.htm (data obrascheniya: 12.06.2020).

22. Remarks By President Obama and President Saakashvili of Georgia After Bilateral Meeting. 30 January 2012. URL: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2012/01/30/remarks-president-obama-and-president-saakashvili-georgia-after-bilatera (data obrascheniya: 06.03. 2020).

23. Remarks by President Trump at Press Conference After NATO Summit // White House [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. 12 July 2018 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-press-conference-nato-summit-brussels-belgium/ (data obrascheniya: 10.06.2020).

24. Remarks by Vice President Biden at 45th Munich Conference on Security Policy // White House. 7 February 2009 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/remarks-vice-president-biden-45th-munich-conference-security-policy (data obrascheniya: 02.04. 2020).

25. Rumer E. Russia and the security of Europe // Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 2016. P. 1—56.

26. Speech by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg at the German Marshall Fund // NATO. Brussels. 13 November 2014 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_114179.htm?selectedLocale=en (data obrascheniya: 11.06.2020).

27. Studzińska Z. How Russia, Step by Step, Wants to Regain an Imperial Role in the Global and European Security System // Connections. 2015. № 4. P. 21—42.

28. Sweeney C. NATO chief opposes Russia’s security pact proposal // Reuters. 17 December 2009 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-nato/nato-chief-opposes-russias-security-pact-proposal-idUSTRE5BF38D20091217 (data obrascheniya: 13.02. 2020).

29. Warsaw Summit Communiqué. 9 July 2016 // NATO [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_133169.htm (data obrascheniya: 13.06.2020).