The Good Wife’s Guide (“Le Ménagier de Paris”) (14th Century) and Russian “Domostroy” (16th Century): Common and Special Features in the Confession Practice as an Everyday Life Form
Table of contents
Share
Metrics
The Good Wife’s Guide (“Le Ménagier de Paris”) (14th Century) and Russian “Domostroy” (16th Century): Common and Special Features in the Confession Practice as an Everyday Life Form
Annotation
PII
S207987840008210-0-1
DOI
10.18254/S207987840008210-0
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Margarita Kouzmina 
Affiliation: Institute of World History, RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Abstract

The article is dedicated to the analysis of one everyday life aspect which has reflected in two historical sources. They belong to different regions and to different historical periods, but to generic macrocivilization. The external resemblance of both written monuments (structure, content) is not, however, a certain sign both of their identity and the result of random similarity. We have to make a comparative analysis to confirm or refute their genetic resemblance. One of the basis for the comparison is the belonging both of written monuments to the Christian culture, in what are incorporated two traditions — catholic and orthodox. The criterion for the analysis became a confessional practice in which a specificity of the culture traditions of medieval France and Russia is reflected.

Keywords
comparative analysis, historical source, Christian ethics, Catholic, Orthodoxy, confession
Received
15.04.2019
Publication date
15.01.2020
Number of characters
52044
Number of purchasers
13
Views
284
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue
1000 RUB / 10.0 SU
All issues for 2019
2500 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. Bibler V. S. Ideya kul'tury v rabotakh Bakhtina // Odissej. 1989. M., 1989.

2. Borisov N. S. Povsednevnaya zhizn' srednevekovoj Rusi nakanune kontsa sveta. M., 2017.

3. Gurevich A. Ya. Izbrannye trudy. Kul'tura Srednevekovoj Evropy. SPb., 2006.

4. Domostroj. Russkij semejnyj ustav. M., 2005.

5. Dushin O. Eh. Reglamentatsiya semejnykh otnoshenij v srednevekovykh zapadnoevropejskikh i drevnerusskikh pokayaniyakh // Verbum. Vyp.18. Ispoved' i pokayanie: u istokov formirovaniya samosoznaniya evropejskogo individa. Pskov, 2016.

6. Kolesov V. V. Domostroj kak pamyatnik srednevekovoj kul'tury // Domostroj. 3-e izd. SPb., 2007.

7. Korogodina M. V. Ispoved' v Rossii v XIV—XIX vv. Issledovanie i teksty. SPb., 2006.

8. Le Goff Zh. Tsivilizatsiya srednevekovogo Zapada. M., 1992.

9. Le Goff Zh. Rozhdenie Evropy. Per. s frants. SPb., 2008.

10. Najdyonova L. P. Khristianskie motivy regulirovaniya sotsial'nogo povedeniya v Rossii XV—XVI vv. M., 2013.

11. Pikhoya R. G. Vozniknovenie pamyatnikov pokayannoj distsipliny Drevnej Rusi v XI v. // Antichnaya drevnost' i Srednie veka. Problemy ideologii i kul'tury. Sverdlovsk, 1987.

12. Filippov I. S. Bibliya i rimskoe pravo: ponyatiya prava, zakona i spravedlivosti v Vul'gate // Filosofiya prava pyatiknizhiya. M., 2012. S. 320—368.

13. Gerson J. Oeuvres complètes / ed. Palémon Glorieux. 1960—1973. Vol. VII. P., 1966—1967.

14. Histoire des femmes en Occident. Le Moyen Age. Sous la dir. de Ch. Klapisch-Zuber. T. 2 / sous la dir. de G. Duby et M. Perrot. P., 1990.

15. Le Ménagier de Paris, traité morale et d’économie domestique, composé vers 1393 / ed. par J. Picnon. T. I, II. P., 1846.

16. Le Domostroï (Ménagier russe du XVI-e siècle). Traduction et commentair par Duchesne M. E. P., 1910.

17. Martin H. Le métier de prédicateur en France septentrionale à la fin du Moyen Age (1350—1520). P., 1988.

18. Priadko E. La valeur historiographique du Domostroj ou la Russie au prisme d’un Ménagier (v. 1560) // Écrire et réécrire l’histoire russe d’Ivan le Terrible à Vasilij Ključevskij (1547—1917) / publié sous la dir. de P. Gonneau et E. Rai. P., 2013.