Collisions of the Decolonization: US Public Opinion Assessments
Table of contents
Share
Metrics
Collisions of the Decolonization: US Public Opinion Assessments
Annotation
PII
S207987840008068-3-1
DOI
10.18254/S207987840008068-3
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Sergey Buranok 
Affiliation: Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education
Address: Russian Federation, Samara
Abstract

The gradual disintegration of colonial empires caused by the growth of national movements and significant weakening of the metropolitan powers after the war became one of the important results of World War II. The process of separation of the colonies coincided with the genesis of a new global confrontation between the former allies in the Anti-Hitler coalition. The Cold War and the search for optimal relations with the closest ally of the USA — Great Britain — required new approaches and views on the decolonization process. At the same time, the ambitions of the White House, which on the one hand supported the disintegration of colonial empires, and on the other diligently tried to take the place of the former empires, led to a number of contradictions with the European states. The article is devoted to the issue of assessing the Suez Crisis in the US press. The whole complexity of perceiving the crisis was reflected in the press, which was trying to form an understanding of the new process in which America was involved. In the course of the difficult search for the optimal political way and view on the crisis, several polar points of view were formed in the American press. Thus, the study of the perception of the crisis by the largest American editions and the most noticeable journalists is essential for the understanding of how the society in the USA after 1956 gradually realized the place of the country in the new system of the international relations, looked for optimal ways of interaction both with the closest allies, and with a number of the new independent states. The article is based on the materials of both democratic, and republican editions of the US press.

Keywords
Press, decolonization, Cold War, Third World, USA, Suez Crisis
Received
28.08.2019
Publication date
30.12.2019
Number of characters
35710
Number of purchasers
18
Views
326
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue
1000 RUB / 10.0 SU
All issues for 2019
2500 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. Kirsanov A. V. SShA i Zapadnaya Evropa. Ehkonomicheskie otnosheniya posle Vtoroj mirovoj vojny. M., 1967.

2. Lekarenko O. G. SShA i nachalo integratsionnykh protsessov v Zapadnoj Evrope // Amerikanskie issledovaniya v Sibiri. Vyp. 8. Tomsk, 2005.

3. Lemin I. M. Anglo-amerikanskie protivorechiya posle Vtoroj mirovoj vojny. M., 1955.

4. Maklehjn D. Vneshnyaya politika Anglii posle Suehtsa. M., 1972.

5. Malkin S. G. Kolonial'nyj opyt Velikobritanii i strategicheskoe myshlenie SShA // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2016. T. 14. № 3 (46). S. 52—67.

6. Malkin Sergey. Between Historiography and Creation of Myth: Decolonization, (Counter)Insurgency and (Post)Imperial Syndrome // ISTORIYA. 2018. Issue 8 (72). URL: http://history.jes.su/s207987840002437-9-1

7. Malkin S.G. Nasledie imperij i politika SShA v stranakh «tret'ego mira»: istoricheskoe modelirovanie asimmetrichnykh konfliktov // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2018. T. 16. № 1. S. 53–68.

8. Mirzekhanov V. S. KhIKh vek v mirovoj istorii (k vykhodu V toma «Vsemirnoj istorii») // Novaya i Novejshaya istoriya. 2015. № 4. S. 3—19.

9. Molchanov N. N. Zapadnaya Evropa: raskol ili edinstvo? M., 1960.

10. Rumyantsev V. P. Vopros o sudokhodstve po Suehtskomu kanalu posle ego natsionalizatsii pravitel'stvom Egipta v 1956 g. i pozitsiya SShA // Amerikanskie issledovaniya v Sibiri. Vyp. 6. Tomsk, 2002.

11. Rumyantsev V. P. Pozitsiya pravyaschikh krugov SShA v svyazi s nachalom anglo-franko-izrail'skoj agressii protiv Egipta 1956 g. // Amerikanskie issledovaniya v Sibiri. Vyp. 5. Tomsk, 2001.

12. Borhi L. Containment, Rollback, Liberation or Inaction? The United States and Hungary in the 1950s // Journal of Cold War Studies. 1999. № 3.

13. Campbell J. The Middle East in the Muted Cold War. Denver, 1964.

14. Cooper S. The Lion's Last Roar: Suez, 1956. N. Y., 1978.

15. Dietl R. Suez 1956: A European Intervention? // Journal of Contemporary History. 2008. Vol. 43.

16. Divine R. Eisenhower and the Cold War. N. Y., 1981.

17. Donovan J. U. S. and Soviet Policy in the Middle East. N. Y., 1972.

18. Evening Independent. 1945. August 11. P. 1; Lewiston Morning Tribune. 1945. August 11. P. 1.

19. Gerges F. The Superpowers and the Middle East. Regional and International Politics, 1955—1967. Oxford, 1994.

20. Hurewitz J. Middle East Dilemmas. The Background of United States Policy. N. Y., 1973.

21. Little D. American Orientalism. The United States and the Middle East since 1945. L., 2003.

22. Louis W. Ends of British Imperialism: The Scramble for Empire, Suez, and Decolonization. N. Y., 2006.

23. Love K. Suez: The Twice-Fought War. N. Y., 1969.

24. Neff D. Warriors at Suez: Eisenhower takes America into the Middle East. Front Cover. N. Y., 1981.

25. Puder C. W. Egyptomania: American cultural representations of Egypt during the Cold War. Long Beach, 2012.

26. Westad A. O. The Global Cold War: Third World Interventions and the Making of Our Times. Cambridge; N.Y., 2005.

27. Westad O. A. Cold War and Revolution: Soviet-American Rivalry and the Origins of the Chinese Civil War. 1993.