French Semiotics and Russian Philosophy: About Some Historical Documents
Table of contents
Share
Metrics
French Semiotics and Russian Philosophy: About Some Historical Documents
Annotation
PII
S207987840005883-0-1
DOI
10.18254/S207987840005883-0
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Inna Merkulova 
Affiliation: State Academical University for the Humanities
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Abstract

The article discusses the relationship between semiotics, history and philosophy. Modern semiotics as the science of signs and the appearance of meaning is significant by interdisciplinary approach and it continues the traditions established in the 20th century by two major European schools: Moscow-Tartu School and Paris School. In this context, the history of semiotics as a discipline acquires a special significance; the genesis of ideas, the analysis of contacts and connections between its representatives from different countries have become extremely important. Analyzing documents from the archives of the Vilnius National Library, we found some contacts of the founder of the Paris School of Semiotics, the French-Lithuanian semiotician Algirdas Julien Greimas with the Russian philosopher Lev Karsavin, and the influence of his ideas on Greimas’s final work “On Imperfection” (1987).

Keywords
semiotics, philosophy, history, Paris School of Semiotics, imperfection
Received
16.05.2019
Publication date
17.06.2019
Number of characters
18084
Number of purchasers
38
Views
196
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue
800 RUB / 10.0 SU
All issues for 2019
1500 RUB / 30.0 SU

References

1. Grejmas A. Zh., Fontanij Zh. Semiotika strastej. Ot sostoyaniya veschej k sostoyaniyu dushi / per. s frantsuzskogo I. G. Merkulovoj, predislovie Kl. Zil'berberga. M., 2007.

2. Grejmas A. Yu. O bogakh i lyudyakh / per. s litovskogo M. Chepajtite, nauchn. red. M. V. Zav'yalovoj. M., 2017.

3. Grejmas A. Yu. Predchuvstvie sovershenstva. Aktual'nost' Karsavina // Soglasie. № 9 (83). Vil'nyus, 1991.

4. Ivanov Vyach. Vs. Izbrannye trudy po semiotike i istorii kul'tury. M., 1999. T. 1.

5. Karsavin L. P. O sovershenstve. Predislovie S. S. Khoruzhego [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.btrudy.ru/resources/BT39/bt39_269_295.pdf.

6. Karsavin L. P. Filosofiya istorii. M., 2007.

7. Karsavin L. P. O lichnosti // Religiozno-filosofskie sochineniya. T. 1 / sost. i vstup. st. S. S. Khoruzhego. M., 1992.

8. Lotman Yu. M. Pamyat' kul'tury. Istoriya i semiotika // Semiosfera. SPb, 2004. S. 335—339.

9. Sovremennaya semiotika i gumanitarnye nauki. Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferentsii k 90-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya A. Zh. Grejmasa i vykhodu na russkom yazyke knigi A. Zh. Grejmasa i Zh. Fontaniya «Semiotika strastej. Ot sostoyaniya veschej k sostoyaniyu dushi» / otv. red. Vyach. Vs. Ivanov. M., 2010.

10. Fontanille J. La semiotique de Greimas: un projet scientifique de long terme. Semiotica, Numero special: A. J. Greimas — Life and semiotics/ La vie et la semiotique d’ A. J. Greimas. Red. T. F. Broden et S. Walsh Matthews, GmbH, De Gruyter Mouton. № 214. 2017. P. 91—110.

11. Fontanille J., Henault A., Panier L., Tarasti E. Premiere table-ronde. Actes Semiotiques [En ligne]. 116. 2013. Consulte le 06/07/2019. URL: https://www.unilim.fr/actes-semiotiques/4808.

12. Greimas A. J., Fontanille J. Semiotique des passions. Des etats de choses aux etats d’ame. Paris, 1991.

13. Greimas A. J. Du sens a l’exil. Chroniques lithuaniennes. Textes reunis par S. Zukas et K. Nastopka, presentes par I. Darrault-Harris et D. Bertrand. Trad. du lithuanien par L. Perkauskyte. Limoges, 2017.

14. Greimas A. J., Le pressentiment de la perfection. L’actualite de Karsavine, trad. du russe d’ I. Merkoulova, revision de J. Fontanille. Revue russe. Paris, 2017. № 48. P. 128—131.

15. Greimas aujourd’hui: l’avenir de la structure. Livre des resumes du Congres de l’Association Francaise de Semiotique. Paris, 2017.

16. Greimas A. J. Karsavino aktualumas. Baltos lankos. Vilnius, 1991. № 1. P. 40—42.

17. Greimas A. J. De l’imperfection. Perigueux, 1987.

18. Lotman J. M. L’explosion et la culture. Trad. du russe d’I. Merkoulova, revision et preface de J. Fontanille. Limoges, 2004.

19. Merkoulova I. Algirdas Julien Greimas et Lev Karsavine. Revue russe. Paris, 2017. № 48. P. 127—131.

20. Parret H., Structurer. Progres semiotiques en epistemologie et en esthetique. Louvain-la-Neuve, 2018.

21. Tarasti E. (Eds.). Communication: Understanding/Misunderstanding. Proceedings of the 9th Congress of the IASS/AIS Helsinki-Imatra. 2007. Acta semiotica Fennica. XXXIV. ISI. Imatra, 2009.

22. Revue des etudes slaves. T. 68. Fascicule 3. Lev Karsavin et la pensee russe du XXe siecle. Sous la direction de F. Lesourd. Paris, 1996.