Comparative Analysis of Historical Scientific and Educational Internet Resources
Comparative Analysis of Historical Scientific and Educational Internet Resources
Annotation
PII
S207987840001905-4-1
DOI
10.18254/S0001905-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Ivan Tarkhanov 
Affiliation: State Academic University for the Humanities
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Boris Yablokov
Affiliation: State Academic University for the Humanities
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Abstract
The article considers the issue of how adequately the sites of historical scientific journals correspond to the level of the most popular Internet resources in terms of their functionality and marketing opportunities. We provide a thorough classification and comparative analysis of historical sites of scholarly journals, popular scientific journals, scientific and educational Internet resources, including educational portals, based on their attendance. The solid conclusion is the growth of the popularity of the scholarly journal and its scientometric indicators is mainly insured by the development of the so-called ‘hybrid’ forms of a scholarly journal on the Internet that combine the use of technological tools specific for Internet resources of a broad profile with the fulfillment of the requirements of scientific periodicals. The case-study is exemplified by the Electronic Scientific and Educational Journal “ISTORIYA”.
Keywords
scholarly journals, scientific and educational journal, Internet media, attendance, general history, comparative analysis
Received
15.07.2017
Publication date
13.08.2017
Number of characters
14526
Number of purchasers
31
Views
3893
Readers community rating
5.0 (3 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 rub. / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full version is available only to subscribers
Subscribe right now
Only article
100 rub. / 1.0 SU
Whole issue
1000 rub. / 10.0 SU
All issues for 2017
5000 rub. / 50.0 SU

References



Дополнительные библиографические источники и материалы

  1. Bakus G. V. Tsifrovoe izmerenie istoricheskogo znaniya: osnovnye vekhi i tendentsii // Ehlektronnyj nauchno-obrazovatel'nyj zhurnal «Istoriya». 2015. T. 6. Vypusk 5 (38) [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. Dostup dlya zaregistrirovannykh pol'zovatelej. URL: http://history.jes.su/s207987840001155-9-1 (data obrascheniya: 05.11.2017). DOI: 10.18254/S0001155-9-1
  2. Golubinskij A. A. Sajt Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhiva drevnikh aktov (g. Moskva) // Ehlektronnyj nauchno-obrazovatel'nyj zhurnal «Istoriya». 2016. T. 7. Vypusk 7 (51) [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. Dostup dlya zaregistrirovannykh pol'zovatelej. URL: http://history.jes.su/s207987840001751-5-1 (data obrascheniya: 11.10.2017). DOI: 10.18254/S0001751-5-1 
  3. Kizhner I. A., Rudov I. N., Rumyantsev M. V., Khlebopros R. G. Konferentsiya Digital Humanities 2016: perspektivy i vyzovy dlya razvitiya soobschestva gumanitarnoj informatiki // Ehlektronnyj nauchno-obrazovatel'nyj zhurnal «Istoriya». 2016. Vyp. 7 (51) [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://history.jes.su/s207987840001676-2-1 (data obrascheniya: 21.10.2017). DOI: 10.18254/S0001676-2-1
  4. Kotlyarov A. D. Biznes-modeli nauchnykh zhurnalov i problema platnykh publikatsij // Ehkonomika obrazovaniya. 2009. № 4. S. 85—91.
  5. Lipkin M. A. , Sekirinskij D. S. Istoriya i kiberprostranstvo: rastsvet tsifrovoj kul'tury ili «konets istorii»? // Ehlektronnyj nauchno-obrazovatel'nyj zhurnal «Istoriya». 2015. T. 6. Vypusk 5 (38) [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. Dostup dlya zaregistrirovannykh pol'zovatelej. URL: http://history.jes.su/s207987840001179-5-1 (data obrascheniya: 05.11.2017). DOI: 10.18254/S0001179-5-1
  6. Khokhlov A. N., Morgunova G. V. O nekotorykh al'ternativnykh podkhodakh k otsenke ehffektivnosti nauchnykh zhurnalov // Nauchnoe izdanie mezhdunarodnogo urovnya 2015: sovremennye tendentsii v mirovoj praktike redaktirovaniya, izdaniya i otsenki nauchnykh publikatsij. Materialy 4-j Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferentsii. S. 174—178.
  7. Yurevich M. A., Tsapenko I. P. Perspektivy primeneniya al'tmetriki v sotsiogumanitarnykh naukakh // Informatsionnoe Obschestvo.2015. Vyp. 4. C. 9—16.
  8. Aleixandre-Benavent R. Correlation between Impact Factor and Public Availability of Published Research Data in Information Science and Library Science Journals //Scientometrics. 2016. Vol. 107. No. 1. P. 1—13.
  9. Brossard D., Scheufele D. A. Science, New Media, and the Public //Science. 2013. Vol. 339. No. 6115. P. 40—41.
  10. Diestro Fernández, Alonso, Marta Ruiz-Corbella, Arturo Galán. Scientific and Editorial Quality in Educational Journals. Trends and Opportunities in the 2.0 Context. Revista de Investigación Educativa. 2017. No. 35.1. P. 235—250.
  11. Evangelou E., Trikalinos T. A., Ioannidis J. P. A. Unavailability of Online Supplementary Scientific Information from Articles Published in Major Journals // The FASEB Journal. 2005. Vol. 19. No. 14. P. 1943—1944.
  12. Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivière V, Sugimoto CR (2013) Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services // PLoS ONE 8(5): e64841. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064841
  13. Siemens R., Timney M., Leitch C., Koolen C., Garnett A., with the ETCL, INKE, and PKP Research Groups. Toward Modeling the Social Edition: An Approach to Understanding the Electronic Scholarly Edition in the Context of New and Emerging Social Media //  Literary and Linguistic Computing . 2012. Vol. 27.Issuu 4. P. 445—461. URL: http://llc.oxfordjournals.org/content/27/4/445.full
  14. Tarkhanov I., Fomin-Nilov D. The Form of Scientific Papers in Online Historical Journals // Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016. Vol. 9. No. 29. DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i29/88931