Property Rights in the English Manor in the 16th — Beginning of the 17th Centuries
Table of contents
Share
Metrics
Property Rights in the English Manor in the 16th — Beginning of the 17th Centuries
Annotation
PII
S207987840001887-4-1
DOI
10.18254/S0001887-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Marina Vinokurova 
Affiliation: Institute of World History. State Academiс University for the Humanities
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Abstract
The article deals with the problem of property rights in the English manor of the 16th — beginning of the 17th centuries. It’s based on the data of the manorial surveys (about 50 of them) in the counties of Wiltshire and Lancashire. The analysis of the surveys testifies that it’s hardly possible to search purely allodia character of landed property, correlating with the notion «full ownership» both in upper and lower levels of the manor. The surveys represent the world of manorial hierarchies, based on the feudal rule of the land to land’s subjection. The lands, represented by the surveys and belonging to manorial lords, may be defined as fee tail if take into consideration the super property rights of the King of England, for these lands belonged to the owners of the manors on the condition of feudal military and administrative service. That is to say — manorial lords were so called tenants in chief (vassals in chief). Their property rights in the general hierarchy of feudal class appeared to be conditional, for it was linked with the specificity of the military (administrative) service. At the same time the very same property rights inside the manor (towards the dependent tenants) appeared to be fee simple: unconditional possession of land with a full freedom of its alienation. If take into consideration estate in law of the manorial lords towards dependent levels of the manor (in particular — to copyholders), it has an absolute character, for in this sense manorial lords were the possessors of free, unconditional and indivisible property inside the manor; and their property right was a specific form of the landed monopoly of the ruling class in general. The provement is concluded in the simple fact: manorial lords were the persons who accepted (but didn’t pay) the rent, which was a material form of their property rights. As for copyholders, who represented the majority of the peasantry in the manors, they were not the owners of their plots, for the superior owner of all lands in the manor (including the tenements of the peasantry) was the lord of the manor. Nevertheless the specificity of feudal property (including feudal possessions) was concluded in the fact of means of productions’ disposal (plot of land, inventory and tools) by the peasantry. Thus, in the texts of the manorial surveys the peasants reveal themselves as «tenants» or «holders» of the plots, possessing of a more or less wide sphere of disposal; but they are not «owners». They are divided by the manorial clerks into categories, the main of which are freeholders and copyholders (tenants on the lord’s will and according to the custom of the manor, who held land on the basis of the manorial court indenture’s copy). The article deals with legal rights (in some cases — with the absence of legal rights) of the freeholders and copyholders from the point of view of both manorial custom and common law courts. A number of the English peasantry expropriation’s factors of so called agrarian revolution are also shown in the article.
Keywords
property, property rights, possession, manor, manorial surveys, manorial custom, freehold, copyhold, annual rent, manorial hierarchy in the property rights
Received
25.08.2017
Publication date
14.09.2017
Number of characters
20671
Number of purchasers
20
Views
3289
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue
1000 RUB / 10.0 SU
All issues for 2017
5000 RUB / 50.0 SU

References



Additional sources and materials

  1. Borough Customs. Vol. 1 / Ed. by M. Bateson // Selden Society. 1904. Vol. 17. P. 136-138.
  2. Survey of the Lands of William the First Earl of Pembroke: 1566-1567. Oxford, 1909.
  3. Survey of the Manors of Philipp the First Earl of Pembroke and Montgomery: 1631-1632. Devizes, 1953.
  4. The Survey of the Manor of Rochdale in the County of Lancashire, parcel of the Possessions of the Worshipful Sir Robert Heath, Knt., His Majesty’s Attorney General, made in 1626 / Ed. by H. Fishwick. Manchester,1913.
  5. Barg M.A. Issledovaniya po istorii anglijskogo feodalizma XI-XIII vv. M., 1962.
  6. Barg M.A. Kategorii i metody istoricheskoj nauki. M., 1984.
  7. Vinokurova M.V. Mir anglijskogo manora. Po zemel'nym opisyam Lankashira i Uiltshira XVI – pervoj treti XVII v. M., 2004.
  8. Vinokurova M.V. Lordy i gorozhane v obychnom prave malykh gorodov srednevekovoj Anglii // Pis'mo i povsednevnost'. M., 2016. Vyp. 3. S. 49-68.
  9. Vinokurova M.V. K voprosu o sostave lokal'nykh dvoryanskikh ehlit v Severo-Zapadnoj Anglii 20-kh godov XVII veka // UniversitasHistoriae. Sbornik statej v chest' P.Yu. Uvarova. M., 2016. S. 101-109.
  10. Institutsii Yustiniana / Per. D. Rassnera. M., 1998.
  11. Kasatov A.A. «Sobstvennost'» v traktatakh anglijskikh yuristov XII-XIII vv. (k voprosu o retseptsii rimskogo prava) // Jusantiquus. № 25. 2012 (2010). S. 96-114.
  12. Kasatov A.A. Ponyatie proprietas v traktate Genri de Braktona «O zakonakh i obychayakh Anglii» // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. 2010. № 4. S.46-48.
  13. Kirillova A.A. Svobodnoe zemel'noe derzhanie v Anglii XIII v. // Uchenye zapiski MGPI im. V.I. Lenina. M., 1954. T. 68. S. 59-90.
  14. Lavrovskij V.M. Issledovanie po agrarnoj istorii Anglii XVII-XIX vv. M., 1966.
  15. Muromtsev S.A. Retseptsiya rimskogo prava na Zapade. M., 1986.
  16. Pokrovskij I.A. Istoriya rimskogo prava. SPb., 1998.
  17. Poldnikov D.Yu. Dogovornye teorii glossatorov. M., 2008.
  18. Filippov I.S. Razmyshleniya o knige S. Rejnol'ds «Feody i vassaly» i ee vospriyatii v sovremennoj medievistike // Srednie veka. M., 2015. Vyp. 76 (3-4). S. 8-56.
  19. Khatunov S.Yu. Prestuplenie i nakazanie v srednevekovoj Anglii. M., 2003. S. 191-209.
  20. Hadson J. Anglo-Norman Land and the Origin of Property // Law and Government in Medieval England / Ed. G. Garnet and J. Hadson. Cambridge, 1993. P. 198-222.
  21. Maitland F. Selected Historical Essays. Cambridge, 1975.
  22. Milsom S.F. The Legal Framework of English Feudalism. Cambridge, 1977.
  23. Palmer R.C. The Origin of Property in England // Law and History Review. 1985. Vol.3. № 2. P.1-50.
  24. Pollock F., Maitland F. The History of English Law before the time of Edward I. In 2 vols. Cambridge, 1898.
  25. Postan M. The Medieval Economy and Society. L., 1972.
  26. Reynolds S. Fiefs and Vassals. The Medieval Evidence Reinterpreted. Oxford, 1996.
  27. Vinogradoff P. Growth of the Manor, L., 1911.
  28. Vinogradoff P. Villainage in England. L.; N.Y., 1967.