Global History and Philosophy of History: the Problems and Perspectives of Interaction
Table of contents
Share
Metrics
Global History and Philosophy of History: the Problems and Perspectives of Interaction
Annotation
PII
S207987840001763-8-1
DOI
10.18254/S0001763-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Andrey Linchenko 
Affiliation: Finance University
Address: Russian Federation, Lipetsk
Abstract
The article deals with modern problems of interaction between the philosophy of history and global history. The idea of the anthropological context as the most promising field of their interaction is substantiated. The author tries to show that in the context of modern understanding of philosophy, the correlation between the philosophy of history and global history is not vertical and hierarchical, but horizontal, dialogical. The article concludes that the problems of the wholeness of historical consciousness as a concrete environment in which the interaction of the philosophy of history and global history could produce an efficient result.
Keywords
philosophy of history, global history, historical cinsciousness, ethics of history
Received
12.12.2016
Publication date
31.01.2017
Number of characters
29061
Number of purchasers
10
Views
5875
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue
1000 RUB / 10.0 SU
All issues for 2016
2500 RUB / 50.0 SU

References



Additional sources and materials

  1. Bentli D. Obrazy Vsemirnoj istorii v nauchnykh issledovaniyakh XX veka // Vremya mira. Al'manakh. Vyp. 1: Istoricheskaya makrosotsiologiya v XX veke / pod red. N. S. Rozova. Novosibirsk, 2000. S. 27—67.
  2. Interv'yu s Khejdenom Uajtom // Dialog so vremenem. Vyp 14. M., 2000. S. 335—346.
  3. Ionov I. N. Mirovaya istoriya v global'nyj vek: novoe istoricheskoe soznanie. M.: «Akvilon», 2015.
  4. Kim O. V., Malovichko S. I. Global'naya istoriya // Teoriya i metodologiya istoricheskoj nauki. Terminologicheskij slovar' / otv. red. akad. A. O. Chubar'yan. M.: «Akvilon», 2014. S. 79—81.
  5. Marks K., Ehngel's F. Soch. T. 46. Ch. 1.
  6. Perov Yu. V. Istorichnost' i istoricheskaya real'nost'. SPb.: «Izd-vo Sankt-Peterburgskogo filosofskogo obschestva», 2000.
  7. Repina L. P. Istoricheskaya nauka na rubezhe XX—XXI vv. M.: «Krug'», 2011.
  8. Sergejchik E. M. Filosofiya istorii. SPb.: «Izdatel'stvo Lan'», 2002.
  9. Khabermas Yu. Filosofiya kak «mestoblyustitel'» i «interpretator» / Moral'noe soznanie i kommunikativnoe dejstvie. SPb.: «Nauka», 2001. S. 7—34.
  10. Khabermas Yu. Istoricheskoe soznanie i posttraditsionnaya identichnost'. Zapadnaya orientatsiya FRG / Politicheskie raboty. M.: «Praksis», 2005. S. 114—137.
  11. Kharman G. Chetveroyakij ob'ekt. Metafizika veschej posle Khajdeggera. Perm': «Gile Press», 2015.
  12. Yaspers K. Smysl i naznachenie istorii. M.: «Politizdat», 1991.
  13. Gabriel M. Fields of Sense: a new realist Ontology. Edinburgh: “Edinburgh Univ. Press”, 2015.
  14. Nagl-Dosekal H. Ist Geschichtsphilosophie heute noch moglich? // Der Sinn des Historischen. Geschichtsphilosophische Debatten / Nagl-Dosekal H. (Hrsg.). Frankfurt a. M.: “Fisher”, 1996. S. 7—63.
  15. Rohbeck J. Technik — Kultur — Geschichte. Frankfurt a. M.: “Surhrkampf”, 1987.
  16. Roldan G. C. Que queda de la filosofia de la historia de la illustration? // La comprension del passado. Escritos sobre filosofia de la historia / Cruz M., Brauer D. (Comps). Barselona: “Herder”, 2005. P. 187—216.
  17. Rüsen J. Historische vernuft. Gottingen: “Vandelhoeck&Ruprect”, 1983.