On “Super-Organisms” of Archaeological Epoch
Table of contents
On “Super-Organisms” of Archaeological Epoch
Publication type
It is noted that the concepts “development” and “evolution/involution” as processes do not exist by themselves, but always referred to corresponding object: developing, evolving, in evolving. To “archaeological sub-epochs” development process corresponds the object, which with holistic-organicist position may be called “super-organism”. Precisely “super-organisms (of archaeological epoch)” are being born, are developing up to peak of its “meridian” and bear their successors, then wear out, extinguished and, finally, come off with historic arena — at the same time with the advent of own “grandson” (of successor of successor). It is pointed out that the commonness of these processes occurs clearer in surveying of them in logarithmic time-scale.
holism, organicism, super-organism, archaeological epoch, logarithmic scale, self-controlling Humankind's system, information technologies
Publication date
Number of characters
Number of purchasers
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2017


Additional sources and materials

  1. Aristotel'. Fizika. Kniga 2. Glava 8. 
  2. Grinchenko S. N. Metaehvolyutsiya (sistem nezhivoj, zhivoj i sotsial'no-tekhnologicheskoj prirody). M.: «IPIRAN», 2007.
  3. Grinchenko S. N. Sistemnaya pamyat' zhivogo (kak osnova ego metaehvolyutsii i periodicheskoj struktury). M.: «IPIRAN», «Mir», 2004.
  4. Grinchenko S. N. Sotsial'naya metaehvolyutsiya Chelovechestva kak posledovatel'nost' shagov formirovaniya mekhanizmov ego sistemnoj pamyati // Ehlektronnyj zhurnal «Issledovano v Rossii». 2001. S. 1652—1681. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://zhurnal.ape.relarn.ru/articles/2001/145.pdf
  5. Grinchenko S. N., Schapova Yu. L. Informatsionnye tekhnologii v istorii Chelovechestva. M.: «Novye tekhnologii», 2013. (Prilozhenie k zhurnalu «Informatsionnye tekhnologii». № 8. 2013.
  6. Grinchenko S. N., Schapova Yu. L. Istoriya Chelovechestva: modeli periodizatsii // Vestnik RAN. 2010. № 12.
  7. Grinchenko S. N., Schapova Yu. L. Prostranstvo i vremya v arkheologii. Chast' 7. Ot arkheologii klassicheskoj — k mul'tidistsiplinarnoj // Prostranstvo i vremya. 2015. № 4 (22).
  8. Kul'tura arkheologicheskaya // BREh. M., 2010. T. 16.
  9. Spenser G. Osnovaniya sotsiologii: Dannye sotsiologii. Induktsiya sotsiologii. M.: «Knizhnyj dom “Librokom”», 2013.
  10. Trubetskoj S. N. Uchenie o Logose v ego istorii: Filosofsko-istoricheskoe issledovanie. M.: OOO «Izdatel'stvo AST»; Khar'kov «Folio», 2000.
  11. Filosofiya: ehntsiklopedicheskij slovar' / pod redaktsiej A. A. Ivina. M.: «Gardariki», 2004.
  12. Schapova Yu. L. Arkheologicheskaya ehpokha: khronologiya, periodizatsiya, teoriya, model'. M.: «KomKniga», 2005.
  13. Schapova Yu. L. Material'noe proizvodstvo v arkheologicheskuyu ehpokhu. SPb.: «Aletejya», 2011.
  14. Yudin Eh. G. Organizmizm // BSEh. M.: «Sovetskaya ehntsiklopediya», 1974. T. 18. S. 483.
  15. Heylighen F. The Global Superorganism: an evolutionary-cybernetic model of the emerging network society // Social Evolution & History. 2007. Vol. 6. № 1. C. 58—119.



No posts found

Write a review