Method of Social Network Analysis in History
Table of contents
Share
Metrics
Method of Social Network Analysis in History
Annotation
PII
S207987840001686-3-1
DOI
10.18254/S0001686-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Abstract
The article discusses a sociological method of social network analysis as applied to historical material. Special attention is paid to the article by Padgett and Ansell on the rise of Medici family in Florence which opened perspectives of the application of this method in historical studies. The works by K. Lewin and N. Elias are discussed as methodological basis. The study of R. Collins is used as an example of the application of this method in the sphere of the history of ideas. The Republic of Letters is discussed as one of the most appropriate objects of study using this method. Modern approaches to social network analysis are analyzed. The limits of the method of social network analysis in history are defined.
Keywords
method of social network analysis, Republic of Letters, community, group, network
Received
01.02.2017
Publication date
28.03.2017
Number of characters
16858
Number of purchasers
39
Views
5824
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue
1000 RUB / 10.0 SU
All issues for 2017
5000 RUB / 50.0 SU

References



Additional sources and materials

  1. Andronov I. E. Evropejskaya «Respublika uchenykh» XVII—XVIII vv.: mekhanizmy obscheniya // Intelligentsiya v istorii: obrazovannyj chelovek v predstavleniyakh sotsial'noj dejstvitel'nosti. M.: «IVI», 2001. S. 69—102.
  2. Elizarov V. P. «Respublika uchenykh»: sotsial'noe prostranstvo «nevidimogo soobschestva» // Prostranstvo i vremya v sovremennoj sotsiologicheskoj teorii / pod red. Yu. L. Kachanova i A. T. Bikbova. M.: «Institut sotsiologii», 2000. S. 103—127.
  3. Kagan M. S. Filosofiya kul'tury. SPb.: «Petropolis», 1996.
  4. Kollinz R. Sotsiologiya filosofij. Novosibirsk: «Sibirskij khronograf», 2002.
  5. Krotov A. A. «Respublika uchenykh» i vtoroe «Rassuzhdenie» Russo: istoriko-kul'turnyj kontekst // Voprosy filosofii. 2012. № 10. S. 140—149.
  6. Levin K. Razreshenie sotsial'nykh konfliktov. SPb.: «Rech'», 2000.
  7. Levin K. Teoriya polya v sotsial'nykh naukakh. SPb.: «Rech'», 2000.
  8. Lyatker Ya. A. Dekart. M.: «Mysl'», 1975.
  9. Trofimova V. S. «Zhenskaya respublika uchenosti» v XVII v. Saarbryuken: «LAP», 2012.
  10. Churakov A. N. Analiz sotsial'nykh setej // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2001. № 1. S. 109—121.
  11. Ehlias N. Obschestvo individov. M.: «Praksis», 2001.
  12. Ehlias N. Pridvornoe obschestvo. M.: «Yazyki slavyanskoj kul'tury», 2002.
  13. Yudin G. Illyuziya nauchnogo soobschestva // Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. 2010. T. 9. № 3. S. 57—84.
  14. D’Monte, Rebecca, Nicole Pohl (eds.). Female communities, 1600—1800: Literary Visions and Cultural Realities. N. Y: “St. Martin’s Press”, 2000.
  15. Padgett J. E., Ansell C. K. Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400—1434 // American Journal of Sociology. 1993. Vol. 98. P. 1259—1319.