Special Effects or, The Tooling is Here. Where are the Results?
Table of contents
Share
Metrics
Special Effects or, The Tooling is Here. Where are the Results?
Annotation
PII
S207987840001637-9-1
DOI
10.18254/S0001637-9-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Abstract
Technological developments tend to move at a very different speed from their cultural assimilation. Hence it is not surprising that impressive technical wizardry should be used in culturally unimpressive ways. The real problem is one of imaginative maturity. Here I argue that Choueka’s old question, “The tools are here; where are the results?”, similarly directs humanist scholars to pay attention first to development of theory rather than to the features of software. For those who know where to look, the results we do have are hardly unimpressive, but to argue their importance requires a new understanding of both theory and practice. The problem scholars face is twofold: first to develop a computational discourse adequate to the best artefactual theories we have; second to reconceive their computational practices as a matter of tooling rather than tool-use. For computer science the biggest challenge is to understand and implement dynamical scholarly practices as they metamorphose from one temporary state to the next.
Keywords
digital humanities, metamorphosis, culture, results, tools, modelling, model systems, text-analysis, textual theory
Received
19.09.2016
Publication date
01.12.2016
Number of characters
41695
Number of purchasers
43
Views
2525
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue
1000 RUB / 10.0 SU
All issues for 2016
5000 RUB / 50.0 SU

References



Additional sources and materials

  1. Baird D. Thing Knowledge: A Philosophy of Scientific Instruments. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004.
  2. Becher T., Trowler P. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines. Buckingham, 2001.
  3. Bellman R. On “Heuristic Problem Solving” by Simon and Newell. Operations Research. 1958. P. 448—449.
  4. Boden M. The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. London, 2004.
  5. Bradley J. Thinking Differently about Thinking: Pliny and Scholarship in the Humanities. Paper Delivered at Digital Humanities. Urbana-Champaign IL. [Electronical resource]. URL: http://www.digitalhumanities.org (date of access: 9 December 2007).
  6. Briggs A. The Pleasure Telephone: A Chapter in the Prehistory of the Media // The Social Impact of the Telephone. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1977.
  7. Burke P. A Social History of Knowledge from Gutenberg to Diderot. Vonhoff Lectures, University of Groningen. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000.
  8. Burrows J. All the Way Through: Testing for Authorship in Different Frequency Strata. Literary and Linguistic Computing. 2007. P. 27—47.
  9. Burrows J. Never Say Always Again: Reflections on the Numbers Game // McCarty W. (ed.) Text and Genre in Reconstruction: Effects of Digitalization on Ideas, Behaviors, Products and Institutions. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. P. 13—35.
  10. Burrows J. Textual Analysis. P. 323—347.
  11. Bush V. As We May Think. Atlantic Monthly. 1945. P. 85—110.
  12. Bush V. Memex Revisited // Science is Not Enough. New York, 1967. P. 197—216.
  13. Computing and the Humanities: Summary of a Roundtable Meeting. 1998. Occasional Paper. New York, 1998. № 41. [Electronical resource]. URL: http://www.acls.org/op41-toc.htm (date of access: 9 December 2007).
  14. Creager A., Lunbeck E., Wise M. (eds.) Science without Laws: Model Systems, Cases, Exemplary Narratives. Durham: Duke University Press, 2007.
  15. Daston L. Are you having fun today? // Merton R., Barber E. The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity: A Study in Sociological Semantics and the Sociology of Science. London: Review of Books, 2004.
  16. Digital Humanities Quarterly. [Electronical resource]. URL: http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/001/2/000012.html (date of access: 7 December 2007).
  17. Dreyfus H. Alchemy and Artificial Intelligence. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation, 1965. P. 32—44.
  18. Dreyfus H. From Micro-Worlds to Knowledge Representation: AI at an Impasse // Brachman R., Levesque H. (eds.) Readings in Knowledge Representation. Los Angeles: Morgan Kaufman Publishers, 1985.
  19. Ellis A., Favat F. From Computer to Criticism: An Application of Automatic Content Analysis to the Study of Literature // Stone P., Dunphy D., Smith M., Ogilvie D. (eds.) The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1966; Ellis A., Favat F. From Computer to Criticism: An Application of Automatic Content Analysis to the Study of Literature // Jennings E. (ed.) Science and Literature: New Lenses for Criticism. New York: Anchor Books, 1970. P. 125—137.
  20. Flanders J. Digital Texts, and the Problem of Pedantry. [Electronical resource]. URL: texttechnology.mcmaster.ca/pdf/vol14_2/flanders14-2.pdf (date of access: 26 December 2007).
  21. Forster L. Literary Studies as Flight from Literature? // Modern Language Review. 1978. Vol. 73.
  22. Frischer B. Report on Summit Accomplishments // Summit on Digital Tools for the Humanities. Charlottesville: Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities, 2006. [Electronical resource]. URL: http://www.iath.virginia.edu/dtsummit/
  23. Geertz C. Religion as a Cultural System // Interpretation of Cultures. P. 87—125. New York: Fontana, 1973.
  24. Gooding D. Experiment // A Companion to the Philosophy of Science // Newton-Smith W. H. (ed.) Blackwell Companions to Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.
  25. Hacking I. Our Neo-Cartesian Bodies in Parts. Critical Inquiry. 2007. Vol. 34. P. 78—105.
  26. Hacking I. Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
  27. Hockey S. Electronic Texts in the Humanities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
  28. Hoover D. End of the Irrelevant Text: Electronic Texts, Linguistics, and Literary Theory.
  29. Kuhn T. The Function of Measurement in Modern Physical Science // The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977. P. 178—224.
  30. Masterman M. The Intellect’s New Eye. Times Literary Supplement 284. 27 April 1962.
  31. McCarty W. An Analytical Onomasticon to the Metamorphoses of Ovid. 2004. [Electronical resource]. URL: http://www.mccarty.org.uk/analyticalonomasticon/ (date of access: 9 December 2007).
  32. McCarty W. Being reborn: the humanities, computing and styles of scientific reasoning // Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies. 2008.
  33. McCarty W. Humanities Computing. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2005.
  34. McCarty W.: Beyond the word: Modelling literary context. Unpublished essay. 2007. [Electronical resource]. URL: http://bit.ly/19UyrN4 
  35. McGann J. Marking Texts of Many Dimensions. Vol. 23. P. 198—217.
  36. McGann J. Texts in N-Dimensions and Interpetation in a New Key [Discourse and Interpretation in N-Dimensions]. 2003. Vol. 2. P. 1—18. [Electronical resource]. URL: http://texttechnology.mcmaster.ca/pdf/vol12_2_02.pdf
  37. Newell A. Metaphors for Mind, Theories of Mind: Should the Humanities Mind? // Sheehan J., Sosna M. (eds.) The Boundaries of Humanity: Humans, Animals, Machines. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991. P. 158—197.
  38. Norton B. Building Demand Models to Improve Environmental Policy Process // Magnani L., Nersessian N. J. (eds.) Model-Based Reasoning: Science, Technology, Values. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2002.
  39. Nyce J., Kahn P. (eds.) From Memex to Hypertext: Vannevar Bush and the Mind’s Machine. Boston: Academic Press, 1991.
  40. Renear A., McGann J. What is text? A debate on the philosophical and epistemological nature of text in the light of humanities computing research // Association for Computers and the Humanities. Charlottesville, 1994. [Electronical resource]. URL: http://www.iath.virginia.edu/ach-allc.99/proceedings/hockey-renear2.html (date of access: 26 December 2007).
  41. Rosen R. Essays on Life Itself. Complexity in Ecological Systems Series. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000.
  42. Schreibman S., Siemens R., Unsworth J. (eds.) A Companion to Digital Humanities. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2004.
  43. Simon H., Newell A. Heuristic Problem Solving: The Next Advance in Operations Research. Operations Research. 1958. Vol. 6 (1). P. 1—10.
  44. Simon H., Newell A. Reply: Heuristic Problem Solving. Operations Research. 1958. Vol. 6 (3). P. 449—450.
  45. Sinclair J. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Describing English Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.
  46. Sinclair S. Computer-Assisted Reading. Literary and Linguistic Computing. 2003. Vol. 18 (2). P. 175—184.
  47. Sperberg-McQueen C. M. Text Analysis Software Planning Meeting. Trip Report. Princeton, May 1996. P. 17—19. [Electronical resource]. URL: http://cmsmcq.com/1996/ceth9605.html (date of access: 2 December 2007).
  48. The Social Impact of the Telephone. MIT Bicentennial Series. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1977.
  49. Unsworth J. Scholarly Primitives: what methods do humanities researchers have in common, and how might our tools reflect this? Humanities Computing: Formal Methods, Experimental Practice, King’s College London. 13 May 2000. 
  50. Winograd T. Thinking Machines: Can There Be? Are We? // Sheehan J., Sosna M. (eds.) The Boundaries of Humanity: Humans, Animals, Machines. P. 198—223. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.
  51. Wittig S. The Computer and the Concept of Text. Computers and the Humanities. 1978. Vol. 11. P. 211—215.