The Science of History and Reconstruction of the Past
Table of contents
Share
Metrics
The Science of History and Reconstruction of the Past
Annotation
PII
S207987840001208-7-1
DOI
10.18254/S0001208-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Abstract
Article is devoted to the problems of de-intellectualization of modern society. Globalization and postmodernism led to a sharp decline in the intellectual level of the modern social world. A radical break with the classical tradition in philosophy, history, literature and culture in general has led to the fact that the great intellectuals have disappeared. Their place was taken by mediocrity and scribblers — people who are not capable to create such spiritual values that would meet the modern realities and could raise the spiritual life to a new higher level. The author points out the great role of historical experience in the study of the Past. Some important features of individual and collective memory are considered. It is shown the limited role of synergetic in the study of history. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the role in historical process of self-organization and government. The article deals with the problems of historical truth and the importance of subjective phenomenons in historical studies.
Keywords
mediocracy, intellect, intellectuals, modernism, postmodernism, rationalism, enlightenment, irrationalism, de-intellectualization, globalization
Received
20.05.2015
Publication date
31.07.2015
Number of characters
34654
Number of purchasers
36
Views
9056
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue
1000 RUB / 10.0 SU
All issues for 2015
2500 RUB / 50.0 SU

References



Additional sources and materials

  1. Barg M. A. Kategorii i metody istoricheskoj nauki. M., 1984.
  2. Blok M. Apologiya istorii ili remeslo istorika. M., 1986.
  3. Gadamer Kh.-G. Istina i metod. M., 1988.
  4. Gol'bakh P. A. Izbrannye proizvedeniya v dvukh tomakh, T. 1. M., 1963.
  5. Gurevich A. Ya. Territoriya istorika // Odissej. 1996.
  6. Gegel' G. V. F. Nauka logiki // Ehntsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk. M., 1974. T. 1.
  7. Deberdyaeva T. Kh. Sinergeticheskij podkhod v poznanii sotsial'no-istoricheskikh yavlenij. Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoj stepeni kandidata filosofskikh nauk, M., 2003.
  8. Knyazeva E. N., Kurdyumov S. P. Sinergeticheskoe rasshirenie antropnogo printsipa // Sinergeticheskaya paradigma. Mnogoobrazie podkhodov. M., 2000.
  9. Kopnin P. V. Logicheskie osnovy nauki. M., 1968.
  10. Majntser K. Slozhnost' i samoorganizatsiya. Vozniknovenie novoj nauki i kul'tury na rubezhe veka // Sinergeticheskaya paradigma. Mnogoobrazie podkhodov. M. 2000.
  11. Marks K., Ehngel's F. Soch. T. 23.
  12. Plutarkh. Sochineniya. 1983.
  13. Rikyor L. Germenevtika. Ehtika. Politika. M., 1995.
  14. Ryuehl' D. Sluchajnost' i khaos, perevod s frantsuzskogo, M., Izhevsk, 2001.
  15. Tosh Dzh. Stremlenie k istine. Kak ovladet' masterstvom istorika. M., 2000.
  16. Follmer G. Ehvolyutsionnaya teoriya poznaniya. Vrozhdennye struktury poznaniya v kontekste biologii, psikhologii, lingvistiki, filosofii i teorii nauki, M., 1998 // Filosofiya nauki. Khrestomatiya, Otvetstvennyj redaktor-sostavitel' L. A. Mikeshina. M., 2005.