Scale, Meaning, Pattern, Form: Conceptual Challenges for Quantitative Literary Studies
Table of contents
Share
Metrics
Scale, Meaning, Pattern, Form: Conceptual Challenges for Quantitative Literary Studies
Annotation
PII
S207987840001646-9-1
DOI
10.18254/S0001646-9-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Edition
Abstract
Digital format introduced in research of literature the new scale of the archive: previously several hundred novels of the nineteenth century could be studied, now it’s possible to analyze thousands, tens of thousands, and soon hundreds of thousands of texts. The article observes the problem to identify the meaning in statistically large sets, establishing patterns and their relationship with forms. If we turn the daily experience of reading literature in the abstract distributions, after we find the patterns and isolate patterns of formal relations that underpin them, it would be the last, and for many of us the main step: use all these innovations to return to the sociological understanding of literature in a completely new basis.
Keywords
quantitative literary studies, distant reading, scale, meaning, pattern, form
Received
11.11.2016
Publication date
01.12.2016
Number of characters
26819
Number of purchasers
45
Views
2623
Readers community rating
5.0 (1 votes)
Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue
1000 RUB / 10.0 SU
All issues for 2016
2500 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

Additional sources and materials


André Leroi-Gourham. Gesture and Speech. MIT Press, 1993. P. 148.
Chris Anderson. The End of The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://archive.wired.com/ science/discoveries/magazine/16–07/pb_theory/
d’Arcy W. Thompson. On Growth and Form. Cambridge, 1917. P. 11.
Elena Tognini Bonelli. The overview of the evolution of corpus linguistics // Anne O’Keeff and Michael McCarthy / eds. The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. Routledge; New York, 2010. P. 19.
Fernand Braudel. History and the social sciences. The longue durée // On History, Chicago University Press. 1980. P. 29.
Krzysztof Pomian. L’Ordre du temps. Paris, 1984. P. 31.
Leo Spitzer. Linguistics and Literary History, 1948 // Representative essays. Stanford University Press, 1988. P. 32.
Max Weber. “Objectivity” in social science and social policy // The Methodology of Social Sciences. Glencoe: The Free Press. P. 90, 97.